Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Saw Palmetto Alopecia

GDP and debt ... ... .... WHAT TO DO??


Everyone looks at GDP as the panacea for our ills, but ... ... ... ....

The problem should be seen under the aspect of "growth possible."

Italy has a "growth can be" far less than those countries' emerging as China (we are talking about increases in GDP which stood at around 0.5 to 1.5%) and China traveling on an increase of 9% per year.
We are not China. Never will ... ... ....
We can not compete with a similar COLOSSUS.
Our potential is considerably lower, and we also hurt.

The value of GDP in 2005 was € 1,422,718,000 of
The value of GDP in 2006 was € 1,475,043,000 of

So the GDP has increased by 52.325 million euro, equivalent to 3.55% instead

The debt in 2005 was € 1,510,926,000
of debt in 2006 was € 1,575,346,000 of

So the debt has increased to 64.42 billion euro, equivalent to 4.09%.

a GDP that is completely eroded by debt in excess of its capacity will never take off.
So what remains is to act on debt
The problem is that governments established so far (all), have all found a state of the art, and have considered logical and conveniente non modificare…………….. (Per la famosa teoria del paniere di voti)
Per cui (TUTTI), facendone arricchire pochi (ma di tanto), per ripianare la bilancia, hanno affamato tanti (e non di poco).

Solo un governo che mette SERIAMENTE le mani nella spesa pubblica, può risolvere il problema………… ma voi ne conoscete ????

Il debito può calare soltanto agendo sulla spesa pubblica e riversando quindi sulle imprese, quei costi estemporanei ma costosi che le imprese girano, per convenienza, allo stato.

Esempio :
la cassa integrazione
la mobilità
il prepensionamento
la disoccupazione

Certo caricando le imprese di questi cosi, bisognerà concedere qualcos’altro (uno sconto fiscale sull’incremento delle esportazioni – sull’incremento d’acquisti non da importazioni – all’incremento dell’occupazione - o il diavolo sa cosa) ma qualcosa che tenda a mantenere i costi dove si creano ed i ricavi anche.

Altro punto è la completa eliminazione delle Assistenze clientelari (pensioni e indennità a chi non spettano).
La revisione totale degli emolumenti dei dirigenti pubblici, domenica sera (18-03-2006) (a W l’Italia) il senatore Salvi diceva a denti stretti che buona parte dei dirigenti pubblici, nel privato sarebbero a malapena normali employees.

The imposition of fees for the usufruct of state assets to fair values \u200b\u200b(not the miseries of the dealers who pay the beaches to the land ... ... ... ... for example).

The fight against tax evasion and social security contributions.

waste in various services (health - local - etc. Etc.) Would, if put in place, sufficient to improve the services with a reasonable savings.

Because the street is not that of spending cuts, but that the fight against waste in spending. All this would

:
• a debt that weighs less than GDP,
· the state to ease the tax burden and, consequently, to an automatic enrichment of the consumer, who is at that point, more willing to consume (with beneficial effect on real GDP and the state coffers).

Because there is an incontrovertible truth ... ... If the consumer has no ability to consume, the product does not consume any.

looks like a cat chasing its tail ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... And it is.
But someone, somewhere will have to begin ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... The property does not change anything.

Thursday, February 8, 2007

Best Fastpitch Softball Bats 2009

EXCUSES BUT ... ... ... ... ... ... .. E 'un-American?? With President Napolitano


Yesterday the Rome prosecutors have formally accused for murder of Nicholas Calidario of U.S. soldier Mario Lozano.

seems like a pointless process ... ... ... .. the defendant is technically in default ... ... ..

Practically there is allowed to process, not invoking the Hague International Criminal Court (which by the way the U.S. has not joined), but according to the U.S., was sufficient to conduct joint investigation in 2005, that investigation But I find the Italian part of the committee to be dissenting with the U.S., but went no further than this ... ... ... ..

The U.S. defense rests on the fact that she claims to be the law, internationally recognized, not to allow its soldiers could be tried by a foreign court, in time of war.

But then Italy was at war ?????
But then what he said the previous government, that ours was a mission of peace is clearly FALSE !!!!!!!!!

But Italy was at war in Iraq or against Iraq against the U.S.??

But then that war was February 3, 1998 in Trentino, m when a U.S. plane sheared the cables of a cable car, killing 20 people??

And even then we were allowed to prosecute the guilty (in honor of Justice, then there was the D'Alema government ... ... ... ... ... ..) Sorry but

:


  • remember this allegiance with the U.S. ... ... ... .. is anti-American??

  • say the U.S. "Our relationship should be reviewed, including during your previous behavior ... ... ... ... is anti-American??

  • think that when shook, I have to be (driven) the external influences even in the form of letters of ambassadors ... ... ... ... ... .. is anti-American??

  • think that, while we are "satisfied" with the fable of the peacekeeping mission, while they do business on oil and oil ... ... .... It is anti-American??

    For complete information, the American soldier who killed Nicola Calidario was promoted to sergeant ... ... ... ... ... ...

Tuesday, January 2, 2007

Lump In Groin After Heart Cath

........ BUT ........ THERE IS AN ANTI



Dear President Napolitano,
In thanking you for your words, if I may extrapolate a part of his address at the end of the year, to externalize my own concern about the "disenchantment" of the Italians towards politics.

"If politics becomes a continuous scream, a race to who gets up most of the tones, a clash over everything, on any matter at any time, suffer from the institutions, starting with Parliament , and suffers the relationship with citizens. When the noise is generally not well can not even grasp the different positions and proposals, then many end up not moving away from this or that party, but by politics.
But be careful here. Who listens to me and to all Italians, I say, do not walk away from politics. Participatio in every way possible, bring your ideas and forces young people. "

But, Mr President, ... ... ... ... .. WHAT WE LOVE TO BE:
  • a political class that has forgotten its citizens.
  • Who sees us only "voting for a minute" and the conditions imposed.
  • who now spectacularized policy to the extreme.
  • GOSSIP those who prefer the reality of the country.
  • Who wants to join the Million Briatore with a belt of bombs, and who, through many evenings in that space, is worried for his safety. Who can
  • fighting over a toilet of the room, oblivious to the fact that many Italians have problems more serious than a toilet.
  • Who created the political "A caste" impenetrable where the favors and benefits are wasted just for themselves and their closest associates.
  • Anyone who thinks that, once in power, must act to destroy what has been done by previous opponents, without looking at what if he destroys a minimum value for the citizens (and this we see at least 12 years).
  • Who can vote only in the case (if in power) or vote against (if it is in opposition) only part of faith, not wanting to accept la possibilità che se una cosa è giusta, non conta chi la propone (destra o sinistra che sia).
  • Chi vota compatto (tranne poche eccezioni) soltanto quando si tratta di aumentare i benefici peri parlamentari.
  • Chi riesce a far diventare problemi politici anche la coscienza umana, e su questa gioca per dividere politicamente.
  • Chi ci ha tolto la possibilità di scegliere le persone, e poi candida pregiudicati e condannati in via definitiva.
  • Chi non vuole cacciare dal parlamento chi ha subito condanne.
  • Chi, sbeffeggiando le norme parlamentari, mantiene due cariche elettive dello Stato.
  • Who creates and emphasizes divisions between public and private employees, with a policy of blatant inequality.

Dear President,
but you do not see when the political class has contempt towards ordinary citizens?
Who has made ad hoc law, who makes economic privileges for some public officials three times greater than its salary.

Please Mr. President, instead of asking the people more love for politics, politicians ask for a bit 'more attention to citizens, but not as much attention as possible, it would be enough for only 10% of what the citizen Calls for attention have already enough, now there is.

Mr President, I express a dream ... ... .... I wish that what I write, was taken up by some newspapers (those media so well and so well kept by the policy "subservient" to the policy) and published, asking and wondering ... ... ...
calls on politicians, "but you is everything"? ??
Wondering "but we really are so newspapers serve???

Thank you for the attention they will devote to my outburst, and the kindly greeting. Maria Di Bartolomeo