5 Inch Triple Wall Wood Stove Pipe

management of public affairs ... ... ... ..
It is clear now that anyone who goes to power, has a vision of things to do enough defined.
Seen in a program that only has value election ... ... .. We have seen too many times after that, what they do or is a legacy of extreme pressure or is dictated only by personal interests.
Hence, we pursue a strategy where power is a little 'less absolute power.
This can be done only by restricting the powers in a "legal fence" which can not be determined by the power management stesso.Da Logic dictates that this must produce a set of rules and modify existing ones for the functioning of the state, just to bring the state management in the "fence" aforesaid.
is clear that these rules are whatever the political color of those who practice them, otherwise everyone makes their own.
So it is proposing these rules pertaining to state management.
fact can not be left in the hands of those who must follow these rules, the law making the same, otherwise we would find ourselves in the paradox that those who must follow is the one who makes them.
legislation should be broad consensus, regardless of their political factions, since we are dealing with the theme of enclosing policy (or that part of the policy that relates to the administration of the state) in precise rules and not preempted.
why are brought changes to the constitution in regard to such regulations, constitutional provisions must foresee a new institution, which acts outside the parliament itself and control applications.
In practice, for example, if MPs want to change their salaries in private companies as the Board of Directors asks shareholders 'meeting to ratify the increase,' cos the Parliament called for ratification to their "partners "(read voters).
In some states (including European ones), I hear, the controllo sul funzionamento amministrativo della cosa pubblica è affidato a comitati eletti dai cittadini, ed hanno il compito di controllare che il depositario del potere non si approfitti della propria posizione.
Questi comitati sono al di fuori della sfera parlamentare e non possono contenere né parlamentari né ex-parlamentari o chiunque abbia ricoperto cariche elettive pubbliche.
Tanto per intenderci, il comitato può chiedere ad un ufficio tecnico regionale “perché ci sono pratiche arretrate” oppure “perché di un qualunque disservizio”.
Certo da noi questa funzione è, in piccolissima misura, svolta dal “difensore civico”, ma con una serie di differenze:
· The Ombudsman is not present in all bodies.
· It can only intervene at the request
• Do not have veto power
• Do not be specifically elected by voters, but chosen by
While it is expected in any public body, a kind of internal audit, but hardly anyone has, or if any, has functions and powers.

At this point we have to ask "if the road already run through the other, why can not we try
?????" This is where disclosure would be useful, by those who have, what are countries that have such control and how it is carried out.

bof_il_vecchio