Football Tackling Bags

the reasons for a new management policy

STATE STAMP (almost) as a company.
If we could compare the state of something, you can closer to a company??
SI, and let's see the points of closeness and discordant points.
OF NEAR

• has a statute (see Constitution)
• current in the work (read LAWMAKING) must follow the statute (see Constitution) has
• members (read citizens)
• has a board of directors (see parliament)
• has a president of the Board (read Government) has
• of revenue and expenditure has a
• Accounting
• has a supervisory body (see Court of Auditors ????)
  DISCORDANT
  
• The general assembly has a potere di sola elezione (non può variare le norme)
• Il costo dell’apparato gestionale non è sottoposto all’assemblea.
• L’assemblea non sceglie l’esecutivo nelle persone ma nei SIMBOLI.
• L’assemblea non può sfiduciare né il Presidente del Consiglio d’amministrazione né il consiglio d’amministrazione stesso.
• Il socio NON PUÒ CAMBIARE AZIENDA.
  

Ora, stabilito che gli apparati di gestione hanno un potere superiore ai soci stessi, va da sé che bisogna riportare il potere a chi in effetti deve detenerlo… I SOCI.
Quindi le norme devono dare la possibilità ai soci, in maniera snella and fast, to change the management structure, if it prevails over the mandate.
This can be done only by restricting the powers in a "legal fence" which can not be ascertained from the same power management ..
Hence my intention to produce a series of rules and modify existing ones for the functioning of the state, just to bring the state management in the "fence" aforesaid.
is clear that these rules are whatever the political color of those who practice them, otherwise everyone makes their own.
So it is proposing these rules pertaining to state management. It can not be left in the hands of those who must follow these rules, the lawmaking, otherwise we would be in the paradox that those who must follow is the one who makes them.
legislation should be broad consensus, regardless of their political factions, since we are dealing with the theme of the policy contain (or that part of the policy that relates to the administration of the state) in precise rules and not preempted.
The member must participate in the drafting of these rules, since it is the only way to control who governs his property (the state).
All the above seems headed toward a goal beyond doubt, not to participate in public affairs, but extend those rules to be adhered to by those who manage public affairs, and this far by political partisanship, we can safely keep us but after we have dictated the rules.

is why I think, backward now, continue to download malice toward the opposing party, without setting a goal, a goal, makes everything look like a gym without a dialectic
end ... ... I would try, in this forum or, with the 'someone for help, even elsewhere.
I would like to create a group without a leader - foremen, and all together, you try to go down this road, maybe side by side with others who have already taken and I do not know ......

bof_il_vecchio