Confidentiality Clause On A Fax Cover Page

evaders??

THERE IS ANTI evaders??

We all talk about rush to escape, giving each of our version of events. One of the versions

riding is "NOT FOR ALL CHARGES NOT ESCAPE ="
This view, however, clashes with some principles and some statistics.

• Some neighboring countries with us, have a tax burden almost identical to ours, and yet not have the levels of tax evasion Italian. (This is enough for me to say that is not true that if you lower taxes, pay them all, in other countries, are high and are charged the same.)


• In times of less tax burden, tax evasion was always equal percentage. In the five years Berlusconi


• the tax burden has decreased, but increased the submerged.
  

It's not a question of tax burden but it is a matter of culture.
while lowering taxes, the evader does not increase its contribution. Ergo

must find another way.

State for its livelihood, has two main streets:

· The
· the direct taxes to indirect taxes.

Direct taxes have 3 chances to input:

1. the companies' taxable income
2. taxable income end-users (read citizens)
3. the taxable income of both.

The companies' taxable income, arises from the difference between what you buy and how much you sell, is that the value of sales excluding all charges.

The taxable income of end-users (read ordinary citizens) is "normal" salary, that is gross income minus some minor expenses and family expenses.
Remember that normally, what can be deduced from the gross is about 25%.

Now if we consider a share of avoidance in the category of firms, it seems natural to say "we infer users Finished all the costs so we bring to the surface and evasion. "
If you did so, since the average savings for end users, (and sometimes not true) is about 1 / 12 of the income year, means that the rest of the income end-user spends it; deduced if all these costs, we ARE an advantage for end users who would increase their average incidence of deductions from 25% to 95%, but the State would be to "lose" almost all of the taxes resulting from step 2.

order to lose the taxes resulting from step 2, should increase taxes resulting from step 1 and indirect taxes. With what result

?

1. Disappears SI tax evasion
2. loses an input of money from end users
3. hampers the development of businesses because more taxes.
4. use the type of tax as unfair (and indirect) that hits regardless of income.

The revenue for the State remains alone on VAT, which today, in fact, pay you (the only one who can not deduct the purchases).

To avoid a loss so great, the state should "SELECTIVE" grant, the deduction of expenses, only those from categories where the risk of escape is higher.

Why not do it on all charges, is also comforted by the fact that some categories (see example supermarkets) have a lower risk of escape, then issue the receipt as "normal." Other categories
issuing the ticket and this is used as the starting date for the warranty purchase.

So if, for example, was apparent in the "SELLERS of razor blades" high fill rate, well, purchases from that category would become deductible. ISTAT

There is a category more likely to escape. Of course this speech

the most unhappy, because it is like saying that there are categories of tax evaders ... ... but the statistics do not hide anything.

Here's an example of evasion ........
(do not have it with plumbers and ..... just an example)
If you change a tap at home and the system makes you ALL without invoice
1. its workforce is in black ............
2. also is black cock ..............

But this means that: • if
can sell a faucet a black man, bought it in black ..... (A wholesaler)
°, but if the wholesaler sold it in black, bought it in black ... (the manufacturer) then

:
• The 1 st evader is Producer ...... .......... • The 2 °
evader is the wholesaler .......... ........ • The 3 rd
evader is the electrician .......... .. ....

Ergo, should be cataloged all the categories that can sell the "goods" and / or labor + and / or services without getting an invoice, because that is where most of escape lurks ....
evasion of labor on the part of a plant has only a fugitive .... implantation. When there is also good, evaders are all steps in the range of goods.

If you adopt a similar system in the categories which meet, the state has a gain (and the end user as well), instead of adopting this method on all classes, State loses more than it currently loses with evasion.
alice
This could be one of the methods ... ... ... ...

Use Wireless Adapter As Hdtv Antenna

FINANCING FOR EVER??

PUBLIC FINANCING OF POLITICAL PARTIES We

in 1993 when a referendum posed the question on public financing to political parties, and 90% of voters were opposed. "

What happened then??

On 10 December 1993 (Ciampi government. ... Coalition PDS, GREEN, DC, PRI, PSI, PSDI, PLI), Law 515, it ended the controversy ... ... .... But how ...??
no longer called " public financing of parties" but it introduces the reimbursement for election expenses. "

this already, in itself, is a clear manipulation of the will of the voters.
But we see the escalation of the "costs paid" ... ... ..

Law 515, art. 10 from:

• pounds 800 for each registered voter.
• only parties who had passed the barrier of 4%
• rounds of elections for the House and Senate (ie, during elections)
  

But June 3, 1999 (the D'Alema government .... Olive Tree coalition - PDCI - UDR - INDEPENDENT) Law 157 "change" slightly ... ... ... as these amounts:

• Lire 4000 for each electoral roll for the parliamentary elections and regional
• + Lira in 3400 for each member electoral lists for elections
• + 4000 Lira for every registered to vote in each referendum
• only parties who had passed the barrier of 1% (virtually all)
• These "refunds" are no longer on the occasion of rounds of elections, but the data once a year regardless of how many rounds you were held in the year (Ie "is not a reimbursement, but funding)
  
  

But, again on July 11, 2002 (Berlusconi's government coalition center-right ... ... ..) the law still suffered a" small tweaks " ... ... ... such as:

Reimbursement is "aligned" to 1 € per year (ie € 5 to term regardless of how many rounds you play).

The difference in spending between the state rules set out in Law 157 and the last amendment of 2002, it weighs a lot.
If we think that voters are 47,160,000, the extra cost is € 129,214,000 for each year of the legislature.

Naturalmente dove si legge “aggravio” per lo stato, è da intendersi “incasso” per i partiti.

Se a ciò aggiungiamo che non esiste nessun controllo da parte dello stato se i costi elettorali sono stati poi sostenuti (e non potrebbe essere altrimenti, dato che non è un vero rimborso spese),si arriva a degli assurdi quali, ad esempio il Partito dei Pensionati, che, non è neppure in parlamento con un seggio, ma ha incassato 3 milioni di euro a fronte di una spesa elettorale dichiarata di 14.300 euro.
A questo va aggiunto, che quasi tutti i partiti, oltre ad avere il tesseramento, come introito, godono di “elargizioni” piuttosto abbondanti da parte di privati, aziende (pubbliche e private)…… Basta ricordarsi la trasmissione che REPORT ha dedicato al problema………
Risulta evidente che bisogna TOGLIERE dalle mani dei parlamentari questa vergognosa libertà…..
A tale scopo va stesa una petizione per riformare questo istituto.

Fermo restando i valori espressi dalla norma del 2002, i rimborsi dovrebbero essere riconosciuti così:

• Il rimborso non avrà più carattere annuale, ma sarà elargito solo in concomitanza di un turno elettorale.
• L’accesso al rimborso terrà, quale sbarramento, lo stesso indicato per l’accesso alle graduatorie
• Il rimborso sarà effettuato, previa documentazione della spesa, onde verificare che la spesa sia inerente il turno elettorale.
• Il rimborso sarà dato a copertura delle spese dichiarate inerenti, fissando un tetto massimo pari al numero dei voti espressi dall’elettorato per quel partito moltiplicato 1 euro.
• Ai partiti è consentita l’entrata di beneficenze e donazioni da estranei, purché dichiarate, qualunque somma siano.
• Se un partito riceve donazioni e non le dichiara, dovrà rimborsare allo stato i rimborsi presi, dall’inizio della legislatura per qualsiasi tipo di turno elettorale, fermo restando quanto previsto dalle norme penali e fiscali sul finanziamento illecito dei partiti.
• Tutte le spese regarding election campaigns, they lose the tax benefits and tax, up to now recognized (see eg. 4% VAT on the posters)

Bikini Wax In Winston Salem, Nc

Unauthorised

In a country, there is a road.
This street is one-way.
All motorists can travel in one direction, but it is forbidden to follow it in the other.

All citizens, except the Member that lives in us ... ... .... THE PARLIAMENTARY ??????

And why?? Why
parliamentarians can take that away Wrong?? There
motivo ! sono cittadini come noi !

Quindi siamo tutti d’accordo che se una strada è “senso unico” tutti dobbiamo percorrerla in senso identico, nessuno contromano, anche perché è pericoloso, oltre che contro la norma.

Allora, per estensione, possiamo dire che, quando ci troviamo dinnanzi ad una norma, se non esistono VALIDI motivi, tutti dobbiamo attenerci alla norma, e chi non si attiene deve essere punito, perché commette un reato – un abuso.

Ma allora, i parlamentarti che hanno concesso a loro stessi la reversibilità della pensione anche a favore dei conviventi, previa semplice dichiarazione, e questo non è concesso ai cittadini, si sono creati una deroga alla norma, senza un VALIDO motivo.
Ma allora questo è un abuso !!!!!!!
Ma questo abuso è in vigore da oltre 10 anni !!!!

Quindi qualcuno dovrebbe denunciare i parlamentari che hanno fatto e che non hanno cancellato questa norma, per “ABUSO IN ATTI D’UFFICIO”

Wedding Invitation Wording Samples Spanish

"The theft of the retirees' pensions

Fino al 1992 era in vigore una legge che si preoccupava di rivalutare il valore lordo delle pensioni, appunto la legge 730 del 1983.
Questa legge rivalutava le pensioni per la percentuale media di aumenti salariali nei 12 mesi precedenti.
Quindi c’era un “gancio” tra i salari e le pensioni, "Hook" formed because, while the employees had the advantage of contractual negotiations to contain the rising cost of living, retirees it had lost, here comes the hook.

Under the emergency of public accounts and extended the retirement age, governments have to safe havens and to a series of measures, first of all was the Decree No. 503/92 which abolished (Article 11) the mechanism of the revaluation of pensions "linked" to the wages. The same Decree

bother to alter the revaluation of pensions, creating a new "hook".
The new "hook" era legare la pensione all’andamento ISTAT (naturalmente non il 100% , ma il 75% medio).

E’del tutto evidente che, con questo attuale meccanismo di calcolo, i pensionati si vedono progressivamente ridursi il proprio reddito rispetto a quello di quando lavoravano; e lo stato non ha mai fatto nulla per porre rimedio a questa disparità giustificandosi con il costo finanziario per il bilancio dello Stato.

Da qui, un paragone tra i due “ganci”, evidenzia che la differenza tra i due è,calcolata tra il 1993 e il 2006, del 29.74%; significa che un pensionato che nel 1992 percepiva 1.100.000 lire nette al mese (pari a 568,10 euro netti mese), con il nuovo “gancio” finds himself in 2006 to a pension net € 640.28 month, and if recalculating the previous system, today would have a net monthly pension of 809.26, creating a lower monthly income of no less than € 168.98.

Now, the Court of Auditors, Section Puglia, with Judgement No. 70 of 2005 and, contrary to earlier indications of the same courts and the Constitutional Court has upheld an appeal by a retired civil servant, condemning ' Reassessment Ipdap to the board attached to the wage occurred in the meantime the staff of similar seniority in service.

We know that a ruling by the Court of Auditors is not teaching, but I think a petition aimed at to recognize this ruling to all pensioners, should be done, because justice demands that there can be unequal treatment of equal individuals ... ... ...
It might also satisfy only the simple recalculation with the old law, they leave in the hands of State arrears, just to prove that even pensioners, although constantly harassed, they understand the difficulty in raising funds to meet this equalization.

Pokemon Frigo Return Descargar

the" old "

I take as a given, even as creeping, which says "pay the pension contributions made by young people) ... ... giving an impression that the old did not pay enough for their retirement.

The calculation is quite complicated because of factors come into play and re-evaluation of income difficult to explain in simple ... ... .. but I'll try to explain it briefly with an example.

• An employee started working in '65


• retired in 2002


• His first annual salary is € 330 gross (equivalent to 40,500 pounds gross month)


• The latter is 20,200 € gross (€ 1,555 € 1,213 € month gross and net monthly)


• retire with about 1140 € gross mese (pari a 892 euro netti mese)

I contributi versati (pari al 32.7%....... fonte INPS) dal ’65 al 2002 formano un monte finanziario che, a scalare, per 38 anni si rivaluta
Ora, togliamo dal versato circa il 19%, annuo che serve all’INPS per i suoi costi (teniamo conto che un impresa privata ha mediamente un costo del personale che pesa circa il 12% del fatturato.
Per consumare il suo versato in 38 anni di lavoro, può percepire la pensione fino al 2025 lui, e fino al 2041 il coniuge superstite (reversibilità della pensione al 60%) senza pesare su nessuno, poiché il versato negli anni è ampiamente bastante.

Naturalmente i calcoli esposti parlano an average position ... ... ...
not take account of pensions BABY - Gifts inefficiency - of pensions to those who do not have the right (eg false invalids) etc.etc.

Thus, a management NORMAL INPS would not have led to the demolition ... ....
If Social Security is now having to pay pensions to the profitability of the old contributions, but with the contributions paid by young workers today, this is the result of poor (and patronage) MANAGEMENT ... ... ... ..

My exposure, also wants to show that, starting, even now that seems a bit late, good management INPS There is possibility that in a number of years is not too high (the number of years depends on the size of the hole), we can bring this institution to less dramatic moments ....... some later begins ........ the harder it is .......

Phone Line Wiring Diagram

hidden truths ..... or if you know little by little discomfort ...

must first start from a premise ... .... Of all the material I searched on the internet, I found only

• The 2005 state budget
• The budget of the Chamber of Deputies 2006
• The budget of the Chamber of Deputies 2005
• Senate Budget 2006 The budget
• Senate 2005

Naturalmente niente suddiviso e esplicitato in maniera sufficientemente analitica.

Nulla ho trovato relativo ai vari ministeri…………

Questo mi porta ad una considerazione iniziale: Nulla si può criticare con cognizione di causa per mancanza di elementi certi.

Ed è proprio da qui che nasce la mia principale considerazione: se poco sai poco fastidio dai…

Il bilancio di un ministero, devo presumere, sia stilato in forma analitica, quasi a somiglianza con un normale bilancio.
Il controllo di gestione, impone infatti che, se non si conosce il centro di costo e la voce di spesa, il controllo è quasi impossibile.

Facciamo un esempio:
In un impresa esistono i costi diretti ed i costi di struttura.
I costi diretti sono quelli che si affrontano per costruire il “prodotto”
I costi di struttura sono tutti gli altri costi che servono per tenete in piedi la macchina

Se un impresa ha problemi di prodotto, la cosa si tenta di risolverla con :

• Nuove tecnologie produttive
• Nuovi prodotti intermedi
• Nuovi semilavorati
• Nuovi fornitori
• Materie prime alternative

Se un impresa ha problemi non legati al prodotto, ma alla macchina “azienda” allora la strada è diversa :
Contenimento delle spese generali
Eliminazione of wasteful expenditure

If we compare this to a ministry, we should say that:
Direct costs are those aimed at the "product" intended as a direct service to that ministry accused
Structural costs are identical to a private company.

But the ministry does not have a turnover, and the only entrance is the contribution of the state.
This contribution must be divided into direct costs and overheads.
But if you do not know the subdivision, if s'ingenera a misunderstanding here.

an example: If

the contribution of the State Ministry for the FOO is € 3 billion for 2006, first you should know: these 3
billion as they are divided?
As for the direct costs to the service of the citizen
As for the cost structure
As for the long-term investment.

If you do not know this division, are missing important data, and the worst thing s'ingenera THEATRE OF POLICY.

If the state provides for 2007 to € 2.5 billion, missing the 0.5 billion compared to 2006 by which entry is removed??

If we do not know, everyone will say, according to his own political expediency, what is more "spectacular". ... ... ... .... But the truth??

The city, though willing, he wants to compare "Truth" spoken by everyone, no weapons, so to be trusted ..

is why it is important that:

• budgets of various ministries are Public policy and public (everyone has a website, but try to find the cost of a ministry in their sites ....)
• the state budget is, cost center and cost item, which is identical to all financial statements from government (central government, parliament, ministries, regions, provinces, municipalities, etc.. etc)
• Highways contributions are expressed in the three categories mentioned above (not otherwise We will never know, when cutting or greater contribution, the difference in who is charged ... ..)

And here begins the Teatrino equivocation !!!!!!!!!!
If there is a right-wing government, a cut in that ministry, the Right will say it cut structural costs, while the left will say that they cut the direct costs of public services ... ... ... ... ... ... if there 'is a left-wing government, it is perfectly equal but opposite ... ...
and we, in the middle, do not know who is right, if not for the political vocation ...

Short Term Disability Verbiage

TFR MEGA-MANAGERS

Proposal No. 5 "taxable TFR of mega-managers when it exceeds the normal contractual severance pay for the "
RELAZIONE
con questo disegno di legge si intende porre un freno e dare un messaggio evidente a quei rapporti di lavoro che tendono a super-premiare i cosiddetti mega-dirigenti, all’atto della conclusione del rapporto di lavoro stesso.
Il proliferare delle mega-liquidazioni, porta, oltre che ad una disuguaglianza di trattamento tra i lavoratori in generale, non mitiga l’aspetto morale e deontologico che si dovrebbe avere in ogni rapporto di lavoro.
Non è certo possibile vietare per legge, che oltre al “NORMALE” TFR, si possa elargire una cosiddetta “buonuscita”, ma per moralizzare l’uso di tale istituto, è necessario porre in atto dei deterrenti all’uso stesso, in maniera di renderli antieconomici.
Soluzione quindi potrebbe essere quella di istituire una norma che regola il valore del TFR, comprimendolo in una forbice che avrà un minino di 1 mensilità per ogni anno di permanenza nel rapporto (o frazione di esso), ed un massimo di 2 mensilità.
Questa norma deve essere chiaramente richiamata in tutti i contratti collettivi e privati.
Qualora si volesse elargire una quota superiore a quanto stabilito dalla norma, tale quota, per essere antieconomica, dovrebbe porre la quota eccedente stessa, per chi la concede, tra i costi indeducibili, per chi la riceve, essere sottoposta ad una tassazione separata tale da renderla antieconomica e infruttuosa.
Tale accorgimento, se proprio non può eliminare the problem, will have at least the benefit of the majority share it can benefit the state. ARTICLES

The indemnity, in any contract, be it collective or individual, must be fixed in the contracts with a minimum of one month's salary for every year of service, or fraction thereof in twelfths, and a maximum of 2 months .
The choice of contract between the minimum and maximum should be located in the contracts.
Collective agreements must contain, at the time of first renewal, such a choice.
If it is not stated in the contracts, and for those individual than for collective, the TFR is considered: • To
the transferor, as non-deductible costs.
• To the recipient, subject to separate taxation dry, free of deductions and allowances as may be provided to 75%.
If, upon liquidation, the rule is not respected, as stated in the contract, but is added to the contract value payable, a sum for any reason, including in the form of goods in kind, such excess shall be considered:
· For the donor, such as non-deductible costs.
• To the recipient, subject to separate taxation dry, free of deductions and allowances as may be provided to 75%.

How To Measure A 37 Inch Tv

on the expenditures of public management policy

UNCONTROLLED POWER
or
BUDGETS OF ROOMS

Currently the administrative control of the expenditure of the two chambers is placed in the hands of the parliament itself, which appointment within the so-called "Quaestors" among MPs.
The existing law there is no guarantee of transparency, given that the controller itself is never the best control desirable.
Add to this that already exist within government, the party responsible for (Court of Auditors, for example), you would only make it more comprehensive and precise control of a type that today is beyond the agencies themselves.
Now, if we analyze the budgets of the chambers of recent years, we realize a real escalation of costs. Just read them
final budget 2005 and budget 2006,
Or alternatively, read the articles on the various newspapers in recent days ... ... ..
The percentages of increase in spending by the two houses of parliament, suggests.
now, and even more evident that we are dealing with a use of public money quite happy.
From Tables available on the website of the camera, for example, spending on parliamentary

2005 = 92200000,

2006 = 92220000,

2007 = 96065000,

2008 = 99535000 , c

on an increase over 2005, of
2006 = 0%,
2007 = 4.192%, 7.956% 2008 =
.
And these changes are controlled by the camera ... ...
The Ministry of the Treasury, is merely to take note of the needs of houses of parliament and establish the amount of expenditure in the total budget (which shall enter into financial). But
... ... ... ... .. CONTROLS AND .???????........... peaceful, has already made room in the person of Quaestors ... ... ... .. (MPs elected by MPs themselves).
goes without saying that such a bad trend is unsustainable ... ... ... ... .. to be changed. It should be changed to the current rule and restore a minimum of external control.
And as we assume can be done ...
The current control of the House and Senate budgets, conducted and managed by their respective rooms Quaestors fell under the jurisdiction of the Court of Auditors. For the remaining
Quaestors all other powers specified in the regulations of the rooms.
The final budget and the budget is drawn up for both competence than in cash.
The Court of Auditors, in collaboration with the Department of Public Service, shall establish:

The balance sheet The cash-flow
the technical report of the balance sheet analysis
detailed budget for each item of expenditure
the final plan of investment projects completed and during construction
Gli eventuali residui di entrate non utilizzati nell’anno corrente, riferito alle spese correnti e non agli investimenti programmati e non ancora effettuati, non possono essere oggetto di accantonamento patrimoniale, ma vanno a fare corpo complessivo con le entrate per l’anno successivo. (questo vuole dire che = se l’anno 2006 aveva entrate correnti pari a 1000, e la spesa per competenza è stata di 900; l’anno 2007, se la spesa preventivata è 1200, il Ministero del Tesoro, contribuirà solo per 1100)
La corte dei conti, in collaborazione con il dipartimento della Funzione Pubblica, redige anche:
Il bilancio preventivo utilizzando la stessa forma del bilancio consuntivo
Il cash-flow
la technical report of the budget
analysis of detailed estimates for each item of expenditure
the investment plan with a ten-year projection, highlighting the economic impact on the budget.
The Court of Auditors, in collaboration with the Department of Public Administration, collects several requests for the year to follow and, following the addresses political, economic and readiness of the government, part of the budget only those that correspond to these addresses .
All documents referred to in paragraphs 2 - 3 - 4 shall be published on the website of the Department of Public Administration, is divided for years, progressive statement in the last 5 years plus preventivo dell’anno successivo e la proiezione poliennale.

Sarà sempre il ministero del tesoro a convogliare le richieste delle camere per il loro sostentamento economico, ma il controllo è dato ad un ente specifico e non all’interno di chi produce la spesa.

Questa è una piccola modifica alla gestione amministrativa del bilancio dei due rami del parlamento, che ancora non tocca la formazione delle singole spese e la loro autorizzazione, ma solo il controllo.
Per questo argomento sarebbe interessante aprire un dibattito e/o un sondaggio.

Bartolomeo Di Maria

I dati di bilancio sono estrapolati dal sito: http://www.camera.it/

5 Inch Triple Wall Wood Stove Pipe

management of public affairs ... ... ... ..
It is clear now that anyone who goes to power, has a vision of things to do enough defined.
Seen in a program that only has value election ... ... .. We have seen too many times after that, what they do or is a legacy of extreme pressure or is dictated only by personal interests.
Hence, we pursue a strategy where power is a little 'less absolute power.
This can be done only by restricting the powers in a "legal fence" which can not be determined by the power management stesso.Da Logic dictates that this must produce a set of rules and modify existing ones for the functioning of the state, just to bring the state management in the "fence" aforesaid.
is clear that these rules are whatever the political color of those who practice them, otherwise everyone makes their own.
So it is proposing these rules pertaining to state management.
fact can not be left in the hands of those who must follow these rules, the law making the same, otherwise we would find ourselves in the paradox that those who must follow is the one who makes them.
legislation should be broad consensus, regardless of their political factions, since we are dealing with the theme of enclosing policy (or that part of the policy that relates to the administration of the state) in precise rules and not preempted.
why are brought changes to the constitution in regard to such regulations, constitutional provisions must foresee a new institution, which acts outside the parliament itself and control applications.
In practice, for example, if MPs want to change their salaries in private companies as the Board of Directors asks shareholders 'meeting to ratify the increase,' cos the Parliament called for ratification to their "partners "(read voters).
In some states (including European ones), I hear, the controllo sul funzionamento amministrativo della cosa pubblica è affidato a comitati eletti dai cittadini, ed hanno il compito di controllare che il depositario del potere non si approfitti della propria posizione.
Questi comitati sono al di fuori della sfera parlamentare e non possono contenere né parlamentari né ex-parlamentari o chiunque abbia ricoperto cariche elettive pubbliche.
Tanto per intenderci, il comitato può chiedere ad un ufficio tecnico regionale “perché ci sono pratiche arretrate” oppure “perché di un qualunque disservizio”.
Certo da noi questa funzione è, in piccolissima misura, svolta dal “difensore civico”, ma con una serie di differenze:
· The Ombudsman is not present in all bodies.
· It can only intervene at the request
• Do not have veto power
• Do not be specifically elected by voters, but chosen by
While it is expected in any public body, a kind of internal audit, but hardly anyone has, or if any, has functions and powers.

At this point we have to ask "if the road already run through the other, why can not we try
?????" This is where disclosure would be useful, by those who have, what are countries that have such control and how it is carried out.

bof_il_vecchio

Masking On Plastic Models

Civil liability of judges

Even this proposal was submitted in the Supreme Court on September 4, 2001 Italian Radicals

Proposal: "Civil liability of judges"

REPORT The goal of this draft law of popular initiative is to enable the citizen to obtain from the magistrate's compensation for the harm they have caused through any willful misconduct or gross negligence, or in case of denial of justice.
From this point of view, it should be noted that in 1987 a referendum was held (the so-called "referendum Dove") which aimed to ensure that the judge had done - with malice or gross negligence - damage to the city, was held liable in the civil: it was, in essence, repeal of Articles 55, 56 and 74 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which prevented the civil magistrate to answer in his errors, as was the case (and does) for any other official of the State. Over 80% of people voted "yes", indicating a clear intention to call for example, the judges who gave out arrest warrants blatantly wrong because of homonyms are not controlled, or who ordered a pre-trial detention lightly, or that under a vague suspicion, undermining the most basic rights of citizens.
Soon thereafter, however, Parliament (led by the trio DC-PCI-PSI) robbed the result of the referendum voting for the so-called "law Vassalli" that swept the very principle of personal responsibility of the prosecutor, for saying that, opposite of the responsibility of State. The "law Vassalli, in fact, provides that a citizen who has suffered harm as a result of negligent or culpable act by a judge can not make him directly responsible, but should instead sue the state and ask it damages. Then, if the trial will be good for the city, then sarà lo Stato a chiamare a sua volta in giudizio il magistrato, che, a quel punto, potrà rispondere in prima persona, ma solo - si badi - entro il limite di un terzo di annualità di stipendio. La legge Vassalli ha così raggiunto il suo scopo: ridurre al minimo le domande di risarcimento e ristabilire un regime di irresponsabilità per i magistrati.
Attraverso l’approvazione di questo disegno di legge invece, si avrà la possibilità di chiamare in causa direttamente il magistrato che abbia errato dolosamente o per colpa grave.
ARTICOLI
Art. 1 L’art. 2, comma 1, della legge 13 aprile 1988 n. 117 recante "Risarcimento dei danni cagionati nell'esercizio delle funzioni giudiziarie e responsabilità Civil magistrates "as amended, is hereby repealed and replaced by the following: 1
. Who has suffered harm as a result of a behavior, an act or a court order put in place by the magistrate with fraud or gross negligence in ' exercise of his duties or for denial of justice can act against them for compensation for property damage and even those non-property arising from deprivation of liberty.
The civil action for damages are governed by ordinary .
are repealed Articles 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of Law No 117 of April 13, 1988.
Article. 9, paragraph 1 of the Act of 13 April 1988 n. 117 è abrogato e sostituito dal seguente: “Il procuratore generale presso la Corte di cassazione per i magistrati ordinari o il titolare dell’azione disciplinare negli altri casi devono esercitare l’azione disciplinare nei confronti del magistrato per i fatti che hanno dato causa all’azione di risarcimento, salvo che non sia stata già proposta, entro due mesi dalla comunicazione che il richiedente il risarcimento deve obbligatoriamente fare, al procuratore generale o al titolare dell’azione disciplinare, contestualmente alla richiesta di risarcimento. Resta ferma la facoltà del Ministro di grazia e giustizia di cui al secondo comma dell’articolo 107 della Costituzione.”

*********************************

We can discuss it .......... ....

How Will Ativan Affect Me

"Separation of the careers of judges"

This proposal was submitted in the Supreme Court by the Italian Radicals September 4, 2001

Proposal "Separation of the careers of judges"

REPORT with this bill is to eliminate the popular initiative is one of the most important anomalies and peculiarities of the judicial Italian than any other liberal Western democracies , Namely the ability of the individual judge to move from the trial stage to the prosecutor, as currently established by Royal Decree dated 30 January 1941 n.12.Tale decree provides that judges, on simple request, and a favorable opinion of the Supreme Council the Judiciary, may pass without distinction, in the course of their careers, from the functions of judges (judges) for duties of prosecutors (magistrates - not judges - that carry out functions of public prosecutor) and viceversa.E ', this current , legislation fraught with negative consequences for the image and the actual impartiality of the judge than the parties to the proceedings, the latter element essential for the perception the legitimacy of the judicial process by those involved against his will. It also seems inconsistent with the adversarial process model provided by the CPP in 1989, and does not appear adequate to ensure the necessary preparation to carry out specific functions, those judges and prosecutors, by definition, very different, and requiring a different "form mentis "guarantor, impartial, third parties between the judge, the same part of the criminal proceedings, the prosecutor, who represents the prosecution against the defense. From this point of view, is absolutely unthinkable that, from day to day, who fought crime on one side of the barricade suddenly be transformed into an impartial guarantor of those who may not be criminal, although suspected or accused by a former colleague of funzioni.Vietare the possibility of transitions between one or the other function is essential to balance the powers of the parties to the proceedings and serves to restore independence and pursuant to the court.

Proposal
Art 1L'articolo 190, paragraph 2, of RD January 30, 1941, No 12 entitled "Judicial Order" is repealed. After paragraph 1 of that Article shall be inserted the following paragraph: "The transfer of judges and prosecutors at the trial stage from this to that is forbidden in any case." Article 191 of the aforementioned RD January 30, 1941, No 12 is repealed.
Article 192, paragraph 6, of the aforementioned RD January 30, 1941, No Limited to 12 words: "except for this passage there is a favorable opinion of the Council of the Judiciary" is abrogato.L 'article mentioned RD 198, January 30, 1941, No Limited to 12 words: "Such destinations can be, in the opinion of the Minister, as the trial stage, as with those prosecutors, regardless of the status possessed by the magistrate." is repealed. ********************************************** This is

soaking ....................

Swollen Spleen Ferret

TREATMENT OF PENSION elective office

Proposal No. 2 " PENSIONS OF elective office "
REPORT
with this design is meant to unify a pension system that, in light of what is at present, this apparent inequality, both between different public bodies, something much more serious in respect of the pension system workers in general.
currently entitled to a pension for MPs, councilors and all the elective office with the previous regulations that accumulate useful contributions to the pension, is managed very rewarding for those who have had the opportunity to fill such positions .
The proposal aims to standardize the current pension system and bringing it to form a conceptual and moral accettabile.
Si intende comunque favorire coloro che hanno ricoperto cariche di diversi tipi, ma non più cumulando le eventuali pensioni, bensì cumulando i periodi pensionistici utili, a prescindere dalla loro maturazione e con quale carica siano stati guadagnati.
Naturalmente tutto parte da un principio di equità ed uguaglianza con tutto il mondo del lavoro che ha precisi dettami per il conseguimento della maturazione del diritto alla pensione.
L’eliminazione di fasce PRIVILEGIATE, è oltremodo il primo risultato che si ottiene nella prospettiva di uguaglianza nei doveri e nei diritti.
La proposta è rivolta a morigerare una categoria già di per sé economicamente privilegiata.
ARTICOLI

1. The pensions of members of parliament, regional councils and in any case, all those entitled by reason of elective public jobs, is set in the time and manner specified in the following Articles.
2. The entitlement only matures after 20 years of contributions he stays in office, even non-continuous.
3. the pension will be paid from 60 years of age, or immediately if the claimant is already the holder of other retirement or old age.
4. Contributions valid only those items related to salary taxed.
5. not allow the aggregation of pension.
6. If a person entitled to a pension is already the owner of another pension of any kind and value the contributions paid in addition to going to redial with the pension paid and shall then be recalculated.
7. If a person entitled has not completed the minimum pension contributions will be used only with the contribution system, and only with the old-age pension, ie not the pay system, adding such contributions to other maturation.
8. The survivor's pension following the law.
9. The right to use contributions at a time, can be used provided that the claimant has registered a presence in the branch where it is elected, at least 75% of the sessions.

********************************************* *******************

I wish, those who have something to add ............

Nys Department Of Motor Vehicle Bill Of Sale

ineligibility and incompatibility between an elective office and between elective and public service

Proposal: " ineligibility and incompatibility between an elective office and between elective and public service "
would like to present following proposal:
REPORT
with this bill is to eliminate the popular initiative is one of the most important features of the electoral anomalies and Italian, namely the impossibility to combine with other elected public office elected public office and / or senior management and / or control in public companies and / or public service and / or public participation.
The current legislation, which departs from the law 60 of February 15, 1953, as amended, provides in part as already in the proposal, but in addition to being incomplete for the time past, has never been careful and continuing up to degenerate inapplicable to the fullest.
E ', this current legislation is fraught with negative consequences for the image and the actual transparency of reports, as well as to affect the proper functioning of the duties provided in the office, it is logical to infer that a double charge requires a division of participation .
should be noted that at present the causes of ineligibility and incompatibility are provided for in Articles. 65 and 66 of the constitution PART TWO - THE ORDER OF REPUBBLICATitolo - Parliament / Section I - The rooms, of which Articles. should be given to change.
therefore prohibits the possibility of holding more charge is essential to balance power and hence the stress on efficiency apparatus bureaucracy.

ARTICLES

1. Whoever, by election or appointment to the parliamentary, governmental, regional, is in a position to hold more charge is required before accepting the new position, to finally give up on the previous year.
2. No elected parliamentary, governmental, regional, may hold positions in public companies and / or public interests and / or public service in an excerpt in Table A. If this is proposed, it must first renounce definitively to the above loads.
3. is no longer a parliamentary committee to judge cases of incompatibility or ineligibility election but a section of a civil court specially chosen and composed.
4. The obligation to apply the standard is given to the court referred to in paragraph 3, which has taken responsibility for civil and criminal, in the person of the bench the whole.
   
   
   Table A of the "public services" referred to in paragraph 2

Incompatibility between elective office and Society:

• Electricity
• Public Transportation
• Telephony
• Water Gas
• Highways
• Waste Management
• RAI
• municipal health agencies generally
• Ministries
• Judiciary
• showing public participation
• mountain communities
• holding public concession of any kind

And who wants to add ..................... ...

************************************************ *****************************

would be useful to know the opinion on this proposal by audiences worldwide.

Football Tackling Bags

the reasons for a new management policy

STATE STAMP (almost) as a company.
If we could compare the state of something, you can closer to a company??
SI, and let's see the points of closeness and discordant points.
OF NEAR

• has a statute (see Constitution)
• current in the work (read LAWMAKING) must follow the statute (see Constitution) has
• members (read citizens)
• has a board of directors (see parliament)
• has a president of the Board (read Government) has
• of revenue and expenditure has a
• Accounting
• has a supervisory body (see Court of Auditors ????)
  DISCORDANT
  
• The general assembly has a potere di sola elezione (non può variare le norme)
• Il costo dell’apparato gestionale non è sottoposto all’assemblea.
• L’assemblea non sceglie l’esecutivo nelle persone ma nei SIMBOLI.
• L’assemblea non può sfiduciare né il Presidente del Consiglio d’amministrazione né il consiglio d’amministrazione stesso.
• Il socio NON PUÒ CAMBIARE AZIENDA.
  

Ora, stabilito che gli apparati di gestione hanno un potere superiore ai soci stessi, va da sé che bisogna riportare il potere a chi in effetti deve detenerlo… I SOCI.
Quindi le norme devono dare la possibilità ai soci, in maniera snella and fast, to change the management structure, if it prevails over the mandate.
This can be done only by restricting the powers in a "legal fence" which can not be ascertained from the same power management ..
Hence my intention to produce a series of rules and modify existing ones for the functioning of the state, just to bring the state management in the "fence" aforesaid.
is clear that these rules are whatever the political color of those who practice them, otherwise everyone makes their own.
So it is proposing these rules pertaining to state management. It can not be left in the hands of those who must follow these rules, the lawmaking, otherwise we would be in the paradox that those who must follow is the one who makes them.
legislation should be broad consensus, regardless of their political factions, since we are dealing with the theme of the policy contain (or that part of the policy that relates to the administration of the state) in precise rules and not preempted.
The member must participate in the drafting of these rules, since it is the only way to control who governs his property (the state).
All the above seems headed toward a goal beyond doubt, not to participate in public affairs, but extend those rules to be adhered to by those who manage public affairs, and this far by political partisanship, we can safely keep us but after we have dictated the rules.

is why I think, backward now, continue to download malice toward the opposing party, without setting a goal, a goal, makes everything look like a gym without a dialectic
end ... ... I would try, in this forum or, with the 'someone for help, even elsewhere.
I would like to create a group without a leader - foremen, and all together, you try to go down this road, maybe side by side with others who have already taken and I do not know ......

bof_il_vecchio

Itchy Skin And Upper Right Quadrant Pain

THE RULES CHANGE ............ For a new political


I think some rules, abbiano bisogno di un RADICALE cambiamento, poichè, a prescindere dalla colorazione politica di chi le ha varate, rappersentano il modo peggiore per essere trasparenti e comunque condivisibili da buona parte dell'elettorato.

Mi sono posto il problema di creare un piccolo elenco, al quale chiunque voglia partecipare, può aggiungere le proprie.

Ecco l'elenco:

Io, per inizio, tenderei a non proporre punti che potrebbero evidenziare una collocazione di parte, concentrandoci invece su quei punti che, a parte la colorazione politica di ognuno, portano bene a prescindere……….

1. Sommatoria di cariche pubbliche
2. Pensioni dei parlamentari
3. High times for eligibility (eg. As for the mayors) (increases the possible rejuvenation)
4. Financial rooms (together 10)
5. taxable TFR of mega-managers when it exceeds the normal contractual severance pay for the category
6. Law Election (nominal - in their garrisons of residence - etc. etc.)
7. mandatory establishment of the ombudsman in each municipality (many municipalities have not) Motorway tolls
9. Waste separation
10. Regulation rooms
11. of taxable all raised the salaries of parliamentarians who are currently paid a lump sum, resulting but 'EXPENSES.
12. Reform of Justice (it could be from Bill "Radical" in 2001)
13. taxable benefits of MPs, when used for its own purposes (eg, blue car)
14. Default notice of public transport that apply the filter on public transport
15. taxable vessels than at Mt. 8.5 (like SUVs)
16. taxable 2-stroke marine engines and diesel engines (they are polluting the sea)
17. Criminal proceedings for tax evasion detected more than 25% of the declared (both tax - income tax - IRAP - etc. Etc .)
18. civil and criminal liability of professionals and magistrates
19. enlargement of the functions of Justices of the Peace
20. elimination of suspended sentence to a degree (if you start serving a sentence) 20a. insertion of the security instead of the suspension of administrative offenses (like scoundrels of the neighborhood that would pay millions of euro extra to stay at home until the end of trials)
21. elimination of all tax benefits to cooperative societies in excess of 20,000 sales. of € 000 (there are banks and insurance companies and large manufacturers)
22. elimination of the rule which allows entry to the placement of the assumptions within 3 days after, but return to the previous notice (many companies that make lavorare in nero, fanno la comunicazione solo dopo che è accaduto un infortunio….)
23. regole per d’acquisizione della cittadinanza da parte degli extracomunitari
24. adeguamento della ritenuta d’acconto alla 2° aliquota prevista (27%)
    
    ora direi che se abbiamo qualcos’altro da aggiungere, aggiungiamolo e poi facciamole diventare delle proposte da portare avanti in tutti i modi possibili ….
    (nota bene……… la numerazione non è di graduatoria ma per riconoscere i punti possibili)

bof_il_vecchio

Spray Tan Booth Newcastle

Buongiorno,
vorrei trovare persone che, a place free from partisan exasperation, want to discuss, create, advance, policy models that differ from those currently, no other form that destroy the active presence of the citizens.
This does not in any way be a way to enter politics, but from the outside, raise the voice and opinions of citizens.

bof_il_vecchio